The real equality of men and women is that they are complementary, not that they can do the exact same things at the exact same standards and the exact same way. The latter is not equality, it is homogenization into a mono-gender, which is what the system promotes.
When men and women are made equal, i.e. their domains vanish and they are made to work on the same things, then the result is that that man's more obsessive relationship to the world and himself, which can also become his greatest weakness by virtue of being disconnected to his surroundings, makes him overall better at performing the narrow tasks of the system than women.
A truly egalitarian society on the other hand would praise the qualities of a great mother: the deep care and attention given to her children, the unconditional love despite the difficulties, the sense of peace that radiates from her. Of course women can do a lot more things than just being mothers, but my point is that society only praises works which are transcendent, those which leave a trace in History, such as the masterpieces in art, or the inventions that build our current world, and pays next to no attention to the mountain of everyday care which a woman can provide to her family.
Only praising women bosses isn't a celebration of femininity, because it tends to squash women into becoming men. If a woman is personally interested in going down that path, then I think she should be allowed, because women can be incredibly different from one another. But there are many types of people that the world needs, and what I notice is that the deep love and embodiment of the feminine isn't valued very much, because ultimately it isn’t useful to the system, which is a major sign of an imbalanced relationship with reality.
Go back to the list of blog posts
2024-10-27